Skip to Content
Report an accessibility problem
Knowledge to action

Knowledge to action

Knowledge to action

Biodiversity is the foundation for our economy and wellbeing. Our work includes biodiversity and public health, business practices and economic development, policy and governance, climate change and adaptation, food systems, social and behavioral change and risk assessment.

We produce insights that transform the way the world values, manages and thinks about biodiversity. By bringing together producers of knowledge with consumers of knowledge, we enable research leading to use-inspired solutions.

We continuously evaluate and adapt ourselves to improve the efficacy and application of our actionable science model, serving as a scalable model that other organizations can tailor and implement around the world. We adopt a strategic and nimble approach to co-produce our research agenda, based on knowledge demands from our partners.

Intended outcomes

Our goal is to protect biodiversity. More specifically, we aim to generate the following outcomes:

Biodiversity is central to decision-making. Achieved by transforming conservation investment, risk assessment and sustainable practices into effective and transparent processes.

A new generation of conservation leaders represents a diverse and global community. Achieved by training diverse and underrepresented students, facilitating experiential career advancement opportunities and identifying and closing gaps in the curriculum – specifically in strategic leadership and environmental communication.

Actionable and collaborative science provides effective solutions for reducing biodiversity loss. Achieved by harnessing approaches such as structured decision making to co-produce decision support frameworks and practical and pragmatic tools for achieving conservation outcomes.

How we work

Our approach embraces key elements of structured decision-making.

To achieve the objectives we continually consider how our research approach and activities work to achieve our goals. First, we work with partners to identify conservation decision needs and possible solutions. We then use data and evidence synthesis to identify the possible outcomes of alternative solutions. Finally, we work with partners to study how implementing solutions affect biodiversity outcomes, and in doing so build our knowledge base about what works in conservation.

Our research approach focuses on three intertwined and overlapping areas:

Diver with net in ocean taking samples

Evidence, metrics and monitoring

Generating empirical support for measuring impact and evaluating outcomes, training and capacity building for what evidence is and how to use it.

Pen with analytics on paper

Decision science and data tools

Creating tools to support evidence-based decisions, working with decision-makers on defining needs for knowledge and decision-making structures (e.g. engaging with businesses) and research into how to translate knowledge into action.

People in a field

Stakeholder engagement

Connecting students and faculty with strategic partners, decision-makers and practitioners.

Examples of biodiversiy outcomes

The following graph illustrates how we apply structured decision-making to achieve examples of outcomes in biodiversity conservation.

We study ourselves

As we implement this actionable science model, we continuously evaluate and adapt ourselves to improve our approach, increase its success rate and serve as a scalable model that other institutions can apply across the globe.

Current projects

# | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z

Actionable science, boundary organizing and co-production of biodiversity outcomes

Our goal through this project is to gain a better understanding of the determinants of actionable science in conservation. While there has been exponential growth in conservation research, much of this science fails to be translated into practice and policy. Numerous solutions have been proposed to bridge this knowledge-action gap, yet it persists.

Derrick Anderson Candice Carr Kelman Leah Gerber

Big data and biodiversity

The Center for Biodiversity Outcomes is partnering with the ASU Biodiversity Knowledge Integration Center to integrate big data in biodiversity decision-making.

Leah Gerber Beckett Sterner

Conservation Solutions Lab

The Conservation Solutions Lab employs an evidence-driven interdisciplinary approach to bring knowledge of what works to conservation and development practitioners to advance effective and equitable engagement of communities in conservation programs. CSL is a collaborative initiative led by a unique partnership between the Arizona State University Center for Biodiversity Outcomes and Chemonics International.

Brian App Candice Carr Kelman Robin Abell Jonathan Adams Rimjhim Aggarwal Beth Allgood Alejandro Arrivillaga Arielle Berghammer-Zeigler Michael Brown Rajesh Buch Megha Budruk Samantha Cheng Nalini Chhetri Nicole Crane Hailey Doughtery Felix Gaschick Leah Gerber Marco Janssen Marvie Javed Jack Kittinger Simon Pierre Lhoest Chuan Liao Alejandro López Serrano Shauna Mahajan Emily Maistrellis David Manuel-Navarrete Robin Martino Greg Minnick Kina Murphy Peggy Ochandarena Beth Polidoro Aireona Bonnie Raschke Melissa Rickman Boucher Michael Schoon Nick Souter Eleanor Sterling Anne Marie Tiani Jim Tolisano Julie Viollaz Christine Vogt John Waugh Supin Wongbusarakum Abigail York Claire Zuazo

Decision science for endangered species pesticide risk assessment

The Center for Biodiversity Outcomes is working with Bayer to develop a decision-making tool to enable them to estimate the range of potential operational, reputational, legal and regulatory risks associated with compliance with the U. S. Endangered Species Act.

Gwen Iacona Steffen Eikenberry Leah Gerber

Diversity and inclusion in conservation science

The Center for Biodiversity Outcomes is developing programs that provide basic literacy in the environment and ecological sustainability, with a particular focus on engaging underserved youth.

Abigail York Leah Gerber Sharon Hall Kimberly Scott

Endangered Species Recovery

The Center for Biodiversity Outcomes has partnered with the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center and the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service to develop a tool to compare different funding allocation strategies for actions to recover endangered species. This tool is called the Endangered Species Recovery Explorer. This work was motivated, in part, by recognition from USFWS of past critiques of its recovery allocation process.

Gwen Iacona Leah Gerber Michael Runge

Fisheries supply management

This project seeks to organize a community of practice, comprised of human rights and fisheries experts and practitioners, to catalyze the systematic integration of social responsibility into seafood supply chains.

Elena Finkbeiner Katie Cramer Kevin Dooley Leah Gerber Jack Kittinger Kailin Kroetz

Mainstreaming biodiversity in the business sector

The Center for Biodiversity Outcomes is working with several partners to bring together biodiversity data from multiple sources and create new methods to integrate the data into corporate decision-making.

K. Selcuk Candan Leah Gerber Beth Polidoro Nico Franz

Plastic pollution and biodiversity risk

The Center for Biodiversity Outcomes is a member of the Plastic Pollution Emissions Working Group. PlasticPEG, who is supported by the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center, is developing a global model that will estimate the efficacy of varying marine plastic pollution intervention strategies.

Leah Gerber Beth Polidoro

Return on investment in biodiversity conservation

Global biodiversity loss is occurring at an unprecedented rate, due in part to a significant shortfall in funding for conservation actions. This research seeks to answer, “How much does it cost to achieve a conservation outcome?”

Leah Gerber Gwen Iacona

Total: 10